When are documents archived? IAC: Annually IR: Annually

How far back does the archive go? IAC: 2003 Edition IR: October 2000, Volume 24

How do I search the archive? (1) Checkmark the "IAC Editions". (2) Checkmark the "IR Volumes".

Search for

---

Search within IAC Editions (one or more)	Latest Update	All Editions
	2022 Edition	2021 Edition	2020 Edition	2019 Edition
	2018 Edition	2017 Edition	2016 Edition	2015 Edition
2014 Edition	2013 Edition	2012 Edition	2011 Edition
2010 Edition	2009 Edition	2008 Edition	2007 Edition
2006 Edition	2005 Edition	2004 Edition	2003 Edition
Search within IR Volumes (one or more)	All Volumes (to Current)	Current IR (since Mar 1, 2022)	Recent IR (since Nov 9, 2022)
	Jan-Dec 2022 (Jan 2022 - Dec 2022)	Jan-Dec 2021 (Jan 2021 - Dec 2021)	Jan-Dec 2020 (Jan 2020 - Dec 2020)	Jan-Dec 2019 (Jan 2019 - Dec 2019)
	Jan-Dec 2018 (Jan 2018 - Dec 2018)	Jan-Dec 2017 (Jan 2017 - Dec 2017)	Jan-Dec 2016 (Jan 2016 - Dec 2016)	Jan-Dec 2015 (Jan 2015 - Dec 2015)
	Jan-Dec 2014 (Jan 2014 - Dec 2014)	Jan-Dec 2013 (Jan 2013 - Dec 2013)	Jan-Dec 2012 (Jan 2012 - Dec 2012)	Jan-Dec 2011 (Jan 2011 - Dec 2011)
Jan-Dec 2010 (Jan 2010 - Dec 2010)	Jan-Dec 2009 (Jan 2009 - Dec 2009)	Jan-Dec 2008 (Jan 2008 - Dec 2008)	Jan-Dec 2007 (Jan 2007 - Dec 2007)
Jul-Dec 2006 (Jul 2, 2006 - Dec 2006)	Volume 29 (Oct 2005 - Jul 1, 2006)	Volume 28 (Oct 2004 - Sep 2005)	Volume 27 (Oct 2003 - Sep 2004)
Volume 26 (Oct 2002 - Sep 2003)	Volume 25 (Oct 2001 - Sep 2002)	Volume 24 (Oct 2000 - Sep 2001)

Advanced Search (Documents since July 2, 2006)

LSA Doc Number:    -

Title:

---

Number of matches: 409

1.   [2022] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be disciplined; or (2) gaming device or gaming devices should be seized and forfeited  ...

2.   [2021] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be disciplined; or (2) gaming device or gaming devices should be seized and forfeited. (b) The respondent has the: (1  ...

3.   [2020] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be  ...

4.   [2019] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be  ...

5.   [2018] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be  ...

6.   [2017] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be  ...

7.   [2016] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be  ...

8.   [2015] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the: (1) respondent should be  ...

9.   [2014] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  ; IC 4-35 Sec. 14. (a) The burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the  ...

10.   [2013] 68 IAC 13 Seizure Forfeiture and Disciplinary Hearings   (PDF)
...  ; IC 4-35 Sec. 14. (a) The burden of proof is at all times on the commission. The commission has the affirmative responsibility of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the  ...

  Next Page

Number of matches: 409
Search completed in 0.064 seconds.